PBFB vs PMJN
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - February vs PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June
Which is better, PBFB or PMJN?
PBFB has been ahead.
PBFB led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBFB | PMJN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $42M | $10M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 14 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +7.64%Best | +3.56% |
| 1Y Return | +10.57%Best | +4.87% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.5% | 1.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -3.8% | -1.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $11,768Best | $10,817 |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Feb 1, 2024 | Jun 1, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 2, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
PBFB vs PMJN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
PBFB vs PMJN Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year PBFB returned +10.57% while PMJN returned +4.87%. Year to date, PBFB is up 7.64% versus a gain of 3.56% for PMJN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBFB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4.5% compared with 1.5% for PMJN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.8% for PBFB and -1.1% for PMJN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBFB charges 0.50% per year while PMJN charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, PBFB currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PMJN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBFB and PMJN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBFB or PMJN?
PBFB has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PMJN charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, PBFB or PMJN?
Over the past year PBFB returned +10.57% vs +4.87% for PMJN, so PBFB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), PBFB annualized +12.33% vs +5.77% for PMJN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBFB or PMJN?
PBFB has been the more volatile fund at 4.5% annualized versus 1.5% for PMJN. Worst drawdown: PBFB -3.8% vs PMJN -1.1%.
Should I hold both PBFB and PMJN?
PBFB and PMJN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBFB or PMJN?
PBFB yields 0.00% while PMJN yields 0.00%, so PMJN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PMJN better than PBFB?
PBFB led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.