PBFR vs PBJA
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - January
Which is better, PBFR or PBJA?
Each has led over a different period.
PBFR led over the full window, PBJA over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBFR | PBJA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $233M | $67M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 28 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +7.53%Best | +7.36% |
| 1Y Return | +10.04% | +10.27%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.2%Best | 4.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.5%Tie | -8.5%Tie |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $12,490Best | $12,412 |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2024 | Dec 29, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 13, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
PBFR vs PBJA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
PBFR vs PBJA Performance
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year PBFR returned +10.04% while PBJA returned +10.27%. Year to date, PBFR is up 7.53% versus a gain of 7.36% for PBJA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBJA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4.3% compared with 4.2% for PBFR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.5% for PBFR and -8.5% for PBJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBFR charges 0.50% per year while PBJA charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, PBFR currently yields 0.01% against 0.00% for PBJA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBFR and PBJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBFR or PBJA?
PBFR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PBJA charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, PBFR or PBJA?
Over the past year PBFR returned +10.04% vs +10.27% for PBJA, so PBJA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PBFR annualized +10.15% vs +9.85% for PBJA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBFR or PBJA?
PBJA has been the more volatile fund at 4.3% annualized versus 4.2% for PBFR. Worst drawdown: PBFR -8.5% vs PBJA -8.5%.
Should I hold both PBFR and PBJA?
PBFR and PBJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBFR or PBJA?
PBFR yields 0.01% while PBJA yields 0.00%, so PBFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PBJA better than PBFR?
PBFR led over the full window, PBJA over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.