PBJA vs PBMY
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - January vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - May
Which is better, PBJA or PBMY?
PBJA has been ahead.
PBJA led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBJA | PBMY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $67M | $39M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 14 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +7.36%Best | +6.27% |
| 1Y Return | +10.27%Best | +8.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.3% | 2.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.5% | -8.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $12,943Best | $12,850 |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2023 | May 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
PBJA vs PBMY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
PBJA vs PBMY Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - May (PBMY) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year PBJA returned +10.27% while PBMY returned +8.42%. Year to date, PBJA is up 7.36% versus a gain of 6.27% for PBMY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBJA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4.3% compared with 2.7% for PBMY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.5% for PBJA and -8.1% for PBMY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBJA charges 0.50% per year while PBMY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, PBJA currently yields 0.00% against 0.07% for PBMY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBJA and PBMY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBJA or PBMY?
PBJA has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PBMY charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, PBJA or PBMY?
Over the past year PBJA returned +10.27% vs +8.42% for PBMY, so PBJA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBJA or PBMY?
PBJA has been the more volatile fund at 4.3% annualized versus 2.7% for PBMY. Worst drawdown: PBJA -8.5% vs PBMY -8.1%.
Should I hold both PBJA and PBMY?
PBJA and PBMY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBJA or PBMY?
PBJA yields 0.00% while PBMY yields 0.07%, so PBMY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PBMY better than PBJA?
PBJA led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.