PBJN vs XTJL
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June vs Innovator US Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
Which is better, PBJN or XTJL?
Nearly the same fund. PBJN costs less.
PBJN has a lower expense ratio. XTJL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBJN | XTJL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $59M | $17M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 14 | 21 |
| YTD Return | +5.35% | +9.63%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.56% | +13.15%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.7%Best | 6.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.7%Best | -16.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $12,644 | $13,718Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 31, 2024 | Jun 30, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
PBJN vs XTJL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
PBJN vs XTJL Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June (PBJN) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Innovator US Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year PBJN returned +7.56% while XTJL returned +13.15%. Year to date, PBJN is up 5.35% versus a gain of 9.63% for XTJL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XTJL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.8% compared with 4.7% for PBJN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.7% for PBJN and -16.7% for XTJL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBJN charges 0.50% per year while XTJL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $79 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBJN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XTJL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBJN and XTJL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBJN or XTJL?
PBJN has an expense ratio of 0.50% while XTJL charges 0.79%. PBJN is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PBJN or XTJL?
Over the past year PBJN returned +7.56% vs +13.15% for XTJL, so XTJL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PBJN annualized +10.27% vs +14.08% for XTJL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBJN or XTJL?
XTJL has been the more volatile fund at 6.8% annualized versus 4.7% for PBJN. Worst drawdown: PBJN -8.7% vs XTJL -16.7%.
Should I hold both PBJN and XTJL?
PBJN and XTJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBJN or XTJL?
PBJN yields 0.00% while XTJL yields 0.00%, so XTJL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XTJL better than PBJN?
PBJN has a lower expense ratio. XTJL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.