PBMY vs PMJA
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - May vs PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January
Which is better, PBMY or PMJA?
PBMY has been ahead.
PBMY led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBMY | PMJA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $39M | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 14 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +6.27%Best | +4.33% |
| 1Y Return | +8.42%Best | +6.15% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.8% | 2.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.1% | -3.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,697Best | $11,170 |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | May 1, 2024 | Dec 31, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
PBMY vs PMJA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
PBMY vs PMJA Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - May (PBMY) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January (PMJA) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year PBMY returned +8.42% while PMJA returned +6.15%. Year to date, PBMY is up 6.27% versus a gain of 4.33% for PMJA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBMY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 2.8% compared with 2.3% for PMJA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.1% for PBMY and -3.0% for PMJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBMY charges 0.50% per year while PMJA charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, PBMY currently yields 0.07% against 0.00% for PMJA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBMY and PMJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBMY or PMJA?
PBMY has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PMJA charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, PBMY or PMJA?
Over the past year PBMY returned +8.42% vs +6.15% for PMJA, so PBMY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PBMY annualized +9.10% vs +6.34% for PMJA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBMY or PMJA?
PBMY has been the more volatile fund at 2.8% annualized versus 2.3% for PMJA. Worst drawdown: PBMY -8.1% vs PMJA -3.0%.
Should I hold both PBMY and PMJA?
PBMY and PMJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBMY or PMJA?
PBMY yields 0.07% while PMJA yields 0.00%, so PBMY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PMJA better than PBMY?
PBMY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.