PBMY vs PMJL
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - May vs PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July
Which is better, PBMY or PMJL?
PBMY has been ahead.
PBMY led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBMY | PMJL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $39M | $7M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 14 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +6.27%Best | +4.49% |
| 1Y Return | +8.42%Best | +5.84% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9%Tie | 1.9%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -1.5%Tie | -1.5%Tie |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,119Best | $10,813 |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | May 1, 2024 | Jun 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
PBMY vs PMJL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
PBMY vs PMJL Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - May (PBMY) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year PBMY returned +8.42% while PMJL returned +5.84%. Year to date, PBMY is up 6.27% versus a gain of 4.49% for PMJL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBMY and PMJL have been equally volatile, both at 1.9% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.5% for PBMY and -1.5% for PMJL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBMY charges 0.50% per year while PMJL charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, PBMY currently yields 0.07% against 0.00% for PMJL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBMY and PMJL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBMY or PMJL?
PBMY has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PMJL charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, PBMY or PMJL?
Over the past year PBMY returned +8.42% vs +5.84% for PMJL, so PBMY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), PBMY annualized +8.50% vs +6.20% for PMJL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBMY or PMJL?
PBMY and PMJL have been equally volatile, both at 1.9% annualized. Worst drawdown: PBMY -1.5% vs PMJL -1.5%.
Should I hold both PBMY and PMJL?
PBMY and PMJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBMY or PMJL?
PBMY yields 0.07% while PMJL yields 0.00%, so PBMY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PMJL better than PBMY?
PBMY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.