PBOT vs VTI
Pictet AI & Automation ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PBOT or VTI?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PBOT led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBOT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $18M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 53 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +32.96%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +35.77%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.7% | 13.1%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.2% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PBOT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PBOT vs VTI Performance
Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT) is an ETF from Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PBOT returned +35.77% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, PBOT is up 32.96% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.7% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBOT charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBOT currently yields 0.07% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
74.4% of PBOT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 25.6% of VTI's money is in holdings PBOT also owns.
Most of PBOT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
33 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in PBOT and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 53 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,123 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PBOT (72.0% of the fund), and 3 for PBOT that do not appear in VTI (5.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PBOT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.97% | 6.88% | 2.91% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.87% | 5.11% | 2.24% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.07% | 2.70% | 2.37% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.30% | 2.38% | 1.92% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 4.44% | 0.49% | 3.95% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 4.54% | 0.15% | 4.39% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 4.18% | 0.42% | 3.76% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.77% | 1.70% | 1.07% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 3.90% | 0.30% | 3.60% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.92% | 1.04% | 1.88% |
74.4% of PBOT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBOT or VTI?
PBOT has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PBOT or VTI?
Over the past year PBOT returned +35.77% vs +16.63% for VTI, so PBOT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBOT or VTI?
PBOT has been the more volatile fund at 29.7% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI.
Should I hold both PBOT and VTI?
PBOT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PBOT and VTI?
74.4% of PBOT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 25.6% of VTI's is in holdings PBOT also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in PBOT and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBOT or VTI?
PBOT yields 0.07% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PBOT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PBOT led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.