PBPH vs QQQ
Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, PBPH or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
PBPH has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBPH | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.13%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 55 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +13.31% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.49% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.6% | 46.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Portfolio Building Block ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 24, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PBPH vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PBPH vs QQQ Performance
Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH) is an ETF from Portfolio Building Block ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PBPH returned +14.49% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, PBPH is up 13.31% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBPH charges 0.13% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $13 vs $18 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBPH currently yields 0.08% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
13.3% of PBPH's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings PBPH also owns.
PBPH and QQQ share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in PBPH and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 55 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 88 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for PBPH (93.5% of the fund), and 23 for PBPH that do not appear in QQQ (54.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBPH and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBPH or QQQ?
PBPH has an expense ratio of 0.13% while QQQ charges 0.18%. PBPH is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PBPH or QQQ?
Over the past year PBPH returned +14.49% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PBPH and QQQ?
13.3% of PBPH's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.7% of QQQ's is in holdings PBPH also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in PBPH and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBPH or QQQ?
PBPH yields 0.08% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than PBPH?
PBPH has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.