PCLC vs XOVR
Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF vs ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Which is better, PCLC or XOVR?
PCLC costs less.
PCLC has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCLC | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 1.81% |
| AUM | $1M | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 39 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +1.32% | +6.41%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +1.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.66% |
| Fund Family | Polen Capital | ERShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 18, 2026 | Nov 7, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
PCLC vs XOVR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PCLC vs XOVR Performance
Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC) is an ETF from Polen Capital and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is an ETF from ERShares. Year to date, PCLC is up 1.32% versus a gain of 6.41% for XOVR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCLC charges 0.50% per year while XOVR charges 1.81%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $181 annually, a gap of $131 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCLC currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XOVR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 31.1% of PCLC's money is in holdings XOVR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for XOVR, our book for it covers 77.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in PCLC and 30 in XOVR, against full books of 39 and 33.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PCLC | Weight in XOVR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.62% | 9.73% | 0.89% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 7.38% | 5.74% | 1.64% |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies | 4.37% | 2.44% | 1.93% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 2.20% | 2.97% | 0.77% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 3.47% | 1.19% | 2.28% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 0.98% | 3.34% | 2.36% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.05% | 1.70% | 0.35% |
31.1% of PCLC is already inside XOVR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCLC or XOVR?
PCLC has an expense ratio of 0.50% while XOVR charges 1.81%. PCLC is the cheaper option, by $131 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PCLC and XOVR?
At least 31.1% of PCLC's money is in holdings XOVR also owns. Our book for XOVR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in PCLC and 30 in XOVR.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCLC or XOVR?
PCLC yields 0.00% while XOVR yields 0.00%, so XOVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XOVR better than PCLC?
PCLC has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.