PCLG vs QPX
Polen Focus Growth ETF vs Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
Which is better, PCLG or QPX?
QPX has been ahead.
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. QPX led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCLG | QPX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 1.74% |
| AUM | $92M | $34M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 27 | 18 |
| YTD Return | -5.60% | +6.84%Best |
| 1Y Return | -8.10% | +10.49%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.47% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.62% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 14.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.8% | -11.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $9,249 | $11,055Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.6% | - |
| Fund Family | Polen Capital | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2025 | Dec 28, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
PCLG vs QPX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
PCLG vs QPX Performance
Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital and Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year PCLG returned -8.10% while QPX returned +10.49%. Year to date, PCLG is down 5.60% versus a gain of 6.84% for QPX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PCLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 14.2% for QPX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.8% for PCLG and -11.6% for QPX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCLG charges 0.49% per year while QPX charges 1.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $174 annually, a gap of $125 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCLG currently yields 0.04% against 0.00% for QPX.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 29 holdings in PCLG and 7 in QPX, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PCLG and 7 in QPX, against full books of 27 and 18.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 7 positions for QPX that do not appear in our book for PCLG (100.0% of the fund), and 24 for PCLG that do not appear in QPX (90.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PCLG and QPX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCLG or QPX?
PCLG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QPX charges 1.74%. PCLG is the cheaper option, by $125 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PCLG or QPX?
Over the past year PCLG returned -8.10% vs +10.49% for QPX, so QPX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), PCLG annualized -7.51% vs +10.55% for QPX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PCLG or QPX?
PCLG has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 14.2% for QPX. Worst drawdown: PCLG -23.8% vs QPX -11.6%.
Should I hold both PCLG and QPX?
PCLG and QPX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCLG or QPX?
PCLG yields 0.04% while QPX yields 0.00%, so PCLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QPX better than PCLG?
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. QPX led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.