PCLG vs SXQG
Polen Focus Growth ETF vs ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF
Which is better, PCLG or SXQG?
SXQG has been ahead.
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. SXQG led over 1Y and the full window. SXQG is less concentrated, with 43.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCLG | SXQG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $92M | $63M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 27 | 235 |
| YTD Return | -5.60% | +3.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | -8.10% | +2.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 11.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.8% | -14.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $9,249 | $10,111Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.6% | 43.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Polen Capital | 6 Meridian ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2025 | May 10, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
PCLG vs SXQG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
PCLG vs SXQG Performance
Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital and ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) is an ETF from 6 Meridian ETF. Over the past year PCLG returned -8.10% while SXQG returned +2.54%. Year to date, PCLG is down 5.60% versus a gain of 3.37% for SXQG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PCLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 11.4% for SXQG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.8% for PCLG and -14.0% for SXQG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCLG charges 0.49% per year while SXQG charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $70 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCLG currently yields 0.04% against 0.00% for SXQG.
Holdings Overlap
41.4% of PCLG's money is in holdings SXQG also owns. 25.0% of SXQG's money is in holdings PCLG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PCLG and 84 in SXQG, against full books of 27 and 235.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 71 positions for SXQG that do not appear in our book for PCLG (72.6% of the fund), and 15 for PCLG that do not appear in SXQG (49.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PCLG | Weight in SXQG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.35% | 4.94% | 4.41% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.82% | 4.74% | 3.08% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 5.67% | 3.71% | 1.96% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 5.54% | 3.68% | 1.86% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.80% | 3.93% | 0.87% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 2.51% | 1.21% | 1.30% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 1.86% | 1.83% | 0.03% |
| IDXXIdexx Laboratories Inc Common Stock Usd 0.1 | 2.37% | 0.55% | 1.82% |
| EMEEmcor Group Inc | 1.48% | 0.45% | 1.03% |
41.4% of PCLG is already inside SXQG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCLG or SXQG?
PCLG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SXQG charges 0.70%. PCLG is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PCLG or SXQG?
Over the past year PCLG returned -8.10% vs +2.54% for SXQG, so SXQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), PCLG annualized -7.51% vs +1.11% for SXQG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PCLG or SXQG?
PCLG has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 11.4% for SXQG. Worst drawdown: PCLG -23.8% vs SXQG -14.0%.
Should I hold both PCLG and SXQG?
PCLG and SXQG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PCLG and SXQG?
41.4% of PCLG's money is in holdings SXQG also owns. 25.0% of SXQG's is in holdings PCLG also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PCLG and 84 in SXQG.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCLG or SXQG?
PCLG yields 0.04% while SXQG yields 0.00%, so PCLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SXQG better than PCLG?
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. SXQG led over 1Y and the full window. SXQG is less concentrated, with 43.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.