PCLG vs XAIW
Polen Focus Growth ETF vs SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, PCLG or XAIW?
PCLG costs less.
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. XAIW is less concentrated, with 61.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCLG | XAIW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $92M | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 27 | 25 |
| YTD Return | -5.60% | -3.89%Best |
| 1Y Return | -8.10% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.6% | 61.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Polen Capital | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2025 | Aug 12, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PCLG vs XAIW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PCLG vs XAIW Performance
Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital and SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (XAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, PCLG is down 5.60% versus a loss of 3.89% for XAIW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCLG charges 0.49% per year while XAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $59 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCLG currently yields 0.04% against 0.00% for XAIW.
Holdings Overlap
27.9% of PCLG's money is in holdings XAIW also owns. 23.6% of XAIW's money is in holdings PCLG also owns.
PCLG and XAIW share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PCLG and 26 in XAIW, against full books of 27 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 15 positions for XAIW that do not appear in our book for PCLG (61.2% of the fund), and 19 for PCLG that do not appear in XAIW (65.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
27.9% of PCLG is already inside XAIW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCLG or XAIW?
PCLG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while XAIW charges 0.59%. PCLG is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PCLG and XAIW?
27.9% of PCLG's money is in holdings XAIW also owns. 23.6% of XAIW's is in holdings PCLG also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PCLG and 26 in XAIW.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCLG or XAIW?
PCLG yields 0.04% while XAIW yields 0.00%, so PCLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XAIW better than PCLG?
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. XAIW is less concentrated, with 61.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.