PDBC vs VTI
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PDBC or VTI?
Commodities against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PDBC led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PDBC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8.0B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.64% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 54 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +49.55%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +56.65%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.82% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.84% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -49.5% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,498 | $17,616Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Commodities | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2014 to Oct 14, 2026 (11.9 years).
PDBC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.9 years both funds cover.
PDBC vs VTI Performance
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PDBC returned +56.65% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, PDBC is up 49.55% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, PDBC compounded at +14.82% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.84% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.06% annualized vs +4.87%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PDBC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.5% for PDBC and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PDBC charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PDBC currently yields 2.64% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in PDBC and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 83.4% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in PDBC and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 54 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PDBC and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PDBC or VTI?
PDBC has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PDBC or VTI?
Over the past year PDBC returned +56.65% vs +16.63% for VTI, so PDBC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), PDBC annualized +4.87% vs +12.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PDBC or VTI?
PDBC has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PDBC -49.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both PDBC and VTI?
PDBC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PDBC or VTI?
PDBC yields 2.64% while VTI yields 1.06%, so PDBC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PDBC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PDBC led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.