PDT vs PSMD

PDT vs PSMD

Which is better, PDT or PSMD?

Each has led over a different period.

PSMD has a lower expense ratio. PDT led over 3Y, PSMD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: PSMDHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPDTPSMD
Expense Ratio2.41%0.49%Best
AUM$656M$96M
Dividend Yield7.68%0.00%
Holdings15412
YTD Return-0.86%+8.98%Best
1Y Return-3.09%+11.83%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+16.62%Best+12.83%
5Y Return (annualized)+0.85%+9.43%Best
Volatility (annualized)16.5%7.3%Best
Max Drawdown-40.4%-12.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$10,432$15,692Best
Fund FamilyJohn Hancock Investment ManagementPacer ETFs
CategoryAllocation/BalancedAllocation/Balanced
StyleEquity-oriented BalancedEquity-oriented Balanced
InceptionDec 21, 1989Dec 22, 2020

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 23, 2020 to Oct 15, 2026 (5.8 years).

PDT vs PSMD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.8 years both funds cover.

Compare PDT against instead:PDT vs SPYPDT vs QQQPDT vs VOOPDT vs VTIPSMD against:PSMD vs VXUS

PDT vs PSMD Performance

John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (January) ETF (PSMD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year PDT returned -3.09% while PSMD returned +11.83%. Year to date, PDT is down 0.86% versus a gain of 8.98% for PSMD.

Over three years, PDT compounded at +16.62% per year against +12.83% for PSMD; over five years the annualized figures are +0.85% and +9.43% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, PSMD has the edge at +9.85% annualized vs +5.21%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PDT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 7.3% for PSMD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.4% for PDT and -12.0% for PSMD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PDT charges 2.41% per year while PSMD charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $241 vs $49 annually, a gap of $192 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PDT currently yields 7.68% against 0.00% for PSMD.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PDT and PSMD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PDTPSMD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PDT or PSMD?

PDT has an expense ratio of 2.41% while PSMD charges 0.49%. PSMD is the cheaper option, by $192 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PDT or PSMD?

Over the past year PDT returned -3.09% vs +11.83% for PSMD, so PSMD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), PDT annualized +5.21% vs +9.85% for PSMD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PDT or PSMD?

PDT has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 7.3% for PSMD. Worst drawdown: PDT -40.4% vs PSMD -12.0%.

Should I hold both PDT and PSMD?

PDT and PSMD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PDT or PSMD?

PDT yields 7.68% while PSMD yields 0.00%, so PDT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PSMD better than PDT?

PSMD has a lower expense ratio. PDT led over 3Y, PSMD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.