PFEB vs RSST

PFEB vs RSST

Which is better, PFEB or RSST?

RSST has been ahead.

PFEB has a lower expense ratio. RSST led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: PFEBHigher Returns: RSST

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPFEBRSST
Expense Ratio0.79%Best0.99%
AUM$896M$602M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.23%
Holdings1836
YTD Return+8.65%+25.38%Best
1Y Return+12.00%+32.18%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+12.79%+22.28%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.98%-
Volatility (annualized)6.1%Best17.1%
Max Drawdown-10.6%Best-30.8%
$10,000 over 3.1 years$14,233$17,822Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustReturn Stacked ETF
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionJan 31, 2020Sep 6, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 6, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).

PFEB vs RSST growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

Compare PFEB against instead:PFEB vs SPYPFEB vs QQQPFEB vs VOOPFEB vs VTIRSST against:RSST vs VXUS

PFEB vs RSST Performance

Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Return Stacked US Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) is an ETF from Return Stacked ETF. Over the past year PFEB returned +12.00% while RSST returned +32.18%. Year to date, PFEB is up 8.65% versus a gain of 25.38% for RSST.

Over three years, PFEB compounded at +12.79% per year against +22.28% for RSST.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RSST has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 6.1% for PFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for PFEB and -30.8% for RSST. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PFEB charges 0.79% per year while RSST charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $99 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PFEB currently yields 0.00% against 0.23% for RSST.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PFEB and RSST you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PFEBRSST

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PFEB or RSST?

PFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while RSST charges 0.99%. PFEB is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PFEB or RSST?

Over the past year PFEB returned +12.00% vs +32.18% for RSST, so RSST leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PFEB or RSST?

RSST has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 6.1% for PFEB. Worst drawdown: PFEB -10.6% vs RSST -30.8%.

Should I hold both PFEB and RSST?

PFEB and RSST have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PFEB or RSST?

PFEB yields 0.00% while RSST yields 0.23%, so RSST currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RSST better than PFEB?

PFEB has a lower expense ratio. RSST led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.