PFEB vs WGMI

PFEB vs WGMI

Which is better, PFEB or WGMI?

Each has led over a different period.

WGMI has a lower expense ratio. PFEB led over 1Y and the full window, WGMI over 3Y.

Lower Fees: WGMIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPFEBWGMI
Expense Ratio0.79%0.75%Best
AUM$896M$194M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1857
YTD Return+8.65%Best-19.60%
1Y Return+12.00%Best-47.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+12.79%+55.28%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.98%-
Volatility (annualized)7.6%Best92.7%
Max Drawdown-11.1%Best-85.8%
$10,000 over 4.7 years$15,143Best$12,583
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustValkyrie Funds
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionJan 31, 2020Feb 7, 2022

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 8, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.7 years).

PFEB vs WGMI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.

Compare PFEB against instead:PFEB vs SPYPFEB vs QQQPFEB vs VOOPFEB vs VTIWGMI against:WGMI vs VXUS

PFEB vs WGMI Performance

Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and CoinShares Bitcoin Mining and Digital Power ETF (WGMI) is an ETF from Valkyrie Funds. Over the past year PFEB returned +12.00% while WGMI returned -47.00%. Year to date, PFEB is up 8.65% versus a loss of 19.60% for WGMI.

Over three years, PFEB compounded at +12.79% per year against +55.28% for WGMI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

WGMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 92.7% compared with 7.6% for PFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.1% for PFEB and -85.8% for WGMI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PFEB charges 0.79% per year while WGMI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $75 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PFEB currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for WGMI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PFEB and WGMI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PFEBWGMI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PFEB or WGMI?

PFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while WGMI charges 0.75%. WGMI is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PFEB or WGMI?

Over the past year PFEB returned +12.00% vs -47.00% for WGMI, so PFEB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PFEB or WGMI?

WGMI has been the more volatile fund at 92.7% annualized versus 7.6% for PFEB. Worst drawdown: PFEB -11.1% vs WGMI -85.8%.

Should I hold both PFEB and WGMI?

PFEB and WGMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PFEB or WGMI?

PFEB yields 0.00% while WGMI yields 0.00%, so WGMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is WGMI better than PFEB?

WGMI has a lower expense ratio. PFEB led over 1Y and the full window, WGMI over 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.