PJFG vs TFGZ

PJFG vs TFGZ

Which is better, PJFG or TFGZ?

TFGZ has been ahead.

PJFG has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%.

Lower Fees: PJFGHigher Returns (1Y): TFGZLess Concentrated: TFGZ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPJFGTFGZ
Expense Ratio0.75%Best0.79%
AUM$148M$12M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings7843
YTD Return+8.89%+16.33%Best
1Y Return+10.08%-
3Y Return (annualized)+22.92%-
Top 10 Weight61.0%49.4%Best
Fund FamilyPGIM InvestmentsThornburg Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionDec 12, 2022Apr 1, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PJFG vs TFGZ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare PJFG against instead:PJFG vs SPYPJFG vs QQQPJFG vs VOOPJFG vs VTITFGZ against:TFGZ vs VXUS

PJFG vs TFGZ Performance

PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF (TFGZ) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, PJFG is up 8.89% versus a gain of 16.33% for TFGZ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PJFG charges 0.75% per year while TFGZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $79 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJFG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for TFGZ.

Holdings Overlap

PJFG already in TFGZ33.8%
TFGZ already in PJFG45.9%

33.8% of PJFG's money is in holdings TFGZ also owns. 45.9% of TFGZ's money is in holdings PJFG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

10 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in PJFG and 42 in TFGZ, against full books of 78 and 43.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 26 positions for TFGZ that do not appear in our book for PJFG (44.4% of the fund), and 26 for PJFG that do not appear in TFGZ (64.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PJFGWeight in TFGZDifference
GOOGLAlphabet Inc9.23%12.16%2.93%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.42%7.18%0.76%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.72%6.00%1.28%
METAMeta Platforms Inc4.17%3.77%0.40%
MAMastercard Inc3.53%3.34%0.19%
CRDO:KYCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.89%3.88%2.99%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity1.09%3.30%2.21%
DDOGDatadog Inc1.71%2.20%0.49%
VRTVertiv Holdings Co0.98%2.62%1.64%
SHOP:CAShopify Inc1.06%1.43%0.37%

45.9% of TFGZ is already inside PJFG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PJFGTFGZ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PJFG or TFGZ?

PJFG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while TFGZ charges 0.79%. PJFG is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PJFG and TFGZ?

45.9% of TFGZ's money is in holdings PJFG also owns. 45.9% of TFGZ's is in holdings PJFG also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in PJFG and 42 in TFGZ.

Which pays a higher dividend, PJFG or TFGZ?

PJFG yields 0.00% while TFGZ yields 0.00%, so TFGZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TFGZ better than PJFG?

PJFG has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.