PJFG vs WINN
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF vs Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF
Which is better, PJFG or WINN?
Nearly the same fund. WINN costs less.
WINN has a lower expense ratio. PJFG led over the full window, WINN over 1Y and 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. WINN is less concentrated, with 57.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJFG | WINN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.57%Best |
| AUM | $148M | $1.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 78 | 146 |
| YTD Return | +8.89% | +11.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.08% | +11.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.92% | +22.98%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 17.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.2% | -23.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $23,806Best | $23,562 |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.0% | 57.5%Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2022 | Feb 2, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.8 years).
PJFG vs WINN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
PJFG vs WINN Performance
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Over the past year PJFG returned +10.08% while WINN returned +11.42%. Year to date, PJFG is up 8.89% versus a gain of 11.03% for WINN.
Over three years, PJFG compounded at +22.92% per year against +22.98% for WINN. Across the full 4-year window we track, PJFG has the edge at +25.64% annualized vs +25.30%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PJFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 17.2% for WINN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.2% for PJFG and -23.7% for WINN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJFG charges 0.75% per year while WINN charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $57 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJFG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for WINN.
Holdings Overlap
99.8% of PJFG's money is in holdings WINN also owns. 80.9% of WINN's money is in holdings PJFG also owns.
Most of PJFG is already inside WINN. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
37 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in PJFG and 74 in WINN, against full books of 78 and 146.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 35 positions for WINN that do not appear in our book for PJFG (18.4% of the fund), and 0 for PJFG that do not appear in WINN (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PJFG | Weight in WINN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 12.21% | 11.75% | 0.46% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 9.23% | 8.02% | 1.21% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.74% | 7.51% | 0.77% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.42% | 6.21% | 0.21% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.72% | 5.40% | 0.68% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.20% | 4.82% | 0.38% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.52% | 3.64% | 0.88% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.17% | 3.89% | 0.28% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.26% | 3.61% | 0.65% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.53% | 2.66% | 0.87% |
99.8% of PJFG is already inside WINN.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJFG or WINN?
PJFG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while WINN charges 0.57%. WINN is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PJFG or WINN?
Over the past year PJFG returned +10.08% vs +11.42% for WINN, so WINN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), PJFG annualized +25.64% vs +25.30% for WINN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PJFG or WINN?
PJFG has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 17.2% for WINN. Worst drawdown: PJFG -24.2% vs WINN -23.7%.
Should I hold both PJFG and WINN?
PJFG and WINN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PJFG and WINN?
99.8% of PJFG's money is in holdings WINN also owns. 80.9% of WINN's is in holdings PJFG also owns. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in PJFG and 74 in WINN.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJFG or WINN?
PJFG yields 0.00% while WINN yields 0.00%, so WINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WINN better than PJFG?
WINN has a lower expense ratio. PJFG led over the full window, WINN over 1Y and 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. WINN is less concentrated, with 57.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.