PJFV vs SASS
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF vs M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF
Which is better, PJFV or SASS?
PJFV costs less.
PJFV has a lower expense ratio. PJFV is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJFV | SASS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $183M | $76M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 37 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +20.68%Best | -7.30% |
| 1Y Return | +27.75% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.90% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | MD Sass |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2022 | Mar 4, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PJFV vs SASS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PJFV vs SASS Performance
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) is an ETF from MD Sass. Year to date, PJFV is up 20.68% versus a loss of 7.30% for SASS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJFV charges 0.33% per year while SASS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $75 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJFV currently yields 0.57% against 0.00% for SASS.
Holdings Overlap
4.7% of PJFV's money is in holdings SASS also owns. 6.0% of SASS's money is in holdings PJFV also owns.
SASS and PJFV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PJFV and 22 in SASS, against full books of 37 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 35 and 22 positions we hold weights for.
PJFV holds 30 positions SASS does not, 84.3% of the fund.
Largest: MSFT 6.30%, AAPL 5.66%, JPM 4.28%, XOM 4.01%, SHEL 3.55%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PJFV | Weight in SASS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 5.98% | 1.31% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PJFV and SASS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJFV or SASS?
PJFV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while SASS charges 0.75%. PJFV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PJFV and SASS?
6.0% of SASS's money is in holdings PJFV also owns. 6.0% of SASS's is in holdings PJFV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PJFV and 22 in SASS.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJFV or SASS?
PJFV yields 0.57% while SASS yields 0.00%, so PJFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SASS better than PJFV?
PJFV has a lower expense ratio. PJFV is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.