PJUL vs XBJA
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - July vs Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January
Which is better, PJUL or XBJA?
Each has led over a different period.
PJUL led over 3Y and the full window, XBJA over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJUL | XBJA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Tie | 0.79%Tie |
| AUM | $1.3B | $94M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 18 | 21 |
| YTD Return | +7.49% | +8.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.97% | +11.38%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.56%Best | +11.68% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.66% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.0%Best | 9.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.7%Best | -17.4% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $16,233Best | $14,062 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2018 | Dec 31, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 3, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.8 years).
PJUL vs XBJA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
PJUL vs XBJA Performance
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year PJUL returned +9.97% while XBJA returned +11.38%. Year to date, PJUL is up 7.49% versus a gain of 8.88% for XBJA.
Over three years, PJUL compounded at +13.56% per year against +11.68% for XBJA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XBJA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.9% compared with 8.0% for PJUL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.7% for PJUL and -17.4% for XBJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJUL charges 0.79% per year while XBJA charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, PJUL currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XBJA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PJUL and XBJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJUL or XBJA?
PJUL has an expense ratio of 0.79% while XBJA charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, PJUL or XBJA?
Over the past year PJUL returned +9.97% vs +11.38% for XBJA, so XBJA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PJUL or XBJA?
XBJA has been the more volatile fund at 9.9% annualized versus 8.0% for PJUL. Worst drawdown: PJUL -10.7% vs XBJA -17.4%.
Should I hold both PJUL and XBJA?
PJUL and XBJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJUL or XBJA?
PJUL yields 0.00% while XBJA yields 0.00%, so XBJA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBJA better than PJUL?
PJUL led over 3Y and the full window, XBJA over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.