PJUS vs QLTY
PGIM Jennison U.S. Core Equity ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, PJUS or QLTY?
PJUS costs less.
PJUS has a lower expense ratio. PJUS is less concentrated, with 41.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJUS | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $7M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 198 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +5.58% | +15.19%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.21% |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.2%Best | 45.5% |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 20, 2026 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PJUS vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PJUS vs QLTY Performance
PGIM Jennison U.S. Core Equity ETF (PJUS) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Year to date, PJUS is up 5.58% versus a gain of 15.19% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJUS charges 0.19% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $50 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJUS currently yields 0.00% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
45.2% of PJUS's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 58.0% of QLTY's money is in holdings PJUS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in PJUS and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 198 and 90.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 27 positions for QLTY that do not appear in our book for PJUS (41.7% of the fund), and 78 for PJUS that do not appear in QLTY (53.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PJUS | Weight in QLTY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.36% | 8.00% | 2.64% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 6.87% | 4.90% | 1.97% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.74% | 4.20% | 2.54% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.60% | 3.30% | 4.30% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.90% | 3.50% | 0.40% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.75% | 4.80% | 3.05% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.31% | 3.70% | 1.39% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.26% | 4.20% | 2.94% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.76% | 2.50% | 0.74% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.41% | 3.80% | 3.39% |
58.0% of QLTY is already inside PJUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJUS or QLTY?
PJUS has an expense ratio of 0.19% while QLTY charges 0.50%. PJUS is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PJUS and QLTY?
58.0% of QLTY's money is in holdings PJUS also owns. 58.0% of QLTY's is in holdings PJUS also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in PJUS and 45 in QLTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJUS or QLTY?
PJUS yields 0.00% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so QLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than PJUS?
PJUS has a lower expense ratio. PJUS is less concentrated, with 41.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.