PMAR vs SIXZ

PMAR vs SIXZ

Which is better, PMAR or SIXZ?

Nearly the same fund. SIXZ costs less.

SIXZ has a lower expense ratio. PMAR led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.

Lower Fees: SIXZHigher Returns: PMAR

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPMARSIXZ
Expense Ratio0.79%0.74%Best
AUM$751M$65M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1815
YTD Return+9.25%+9.88%Best
1Y Return+12.02%Best+11.53%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.17%-
5Y Return (annualized)+9.63%-
Volatility (annualized)5.2%Best6.0%
Max Drawdown-9.3%Best-10.3%
$10,000 over 2.5 years$13,691Best$13,110
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustAllianzIM
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionMar 2, 2020Apr 30, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).

PMAR vs SIXZ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.

Compare PMAR against instead:PMAR vs SPYPMAR vs QQQPMAR vs VOOPMAR vs VTISIXZ against:SIXZ vs VXUS

PMAR vs SIXZ Performance

Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and AllianzIM US Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) is an ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year PMAR returned +12.02% while SIXZ returned +11.53%. Year to date, PMAR is up 9.25% versus a gain of 9.88% for SIXZ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SIXZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.0% compared with 5.2% for PMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for PMAR and -10.3% for SIXZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PMAR charges 0.79% per year while SIXZ charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $74 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PMAR currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for SIXZ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PMAR and SIXZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PMARSIXZ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PMAR or SIXZ?

PMAR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while SIXZ charges 0.74%. SIXZ is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PMAR or SIXZ?

Over the past year PMAR returned +12.02% vs +11.53% for SIXZ, so PMAR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PMAR or SIXZ?

SIXZ has been the more volatile fund at 6.0% annualized versus 5.2% for PMAR. Worst drawdown: PMAR -9.3% vs SIXZ -10.3%.

Should I hold both PMAR and SIXZ?

PMAR and SIXZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PMAR or SIXZ?

PMAR yields 0.00% while SIXZ yields 0.00%, so SIXZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SIXZ better than PMAR?

SIXZ has a lower expense ratio. PMAR led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.