PMAY vs XBJL

PMAY vs XBJL

Which is better, PMAY or XBJL?

XBJL has been ahead.

XBJL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: XBJL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPMAYXBJL
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$820M$77M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1227
YTD Return+7.13%+7.79%Best
1Y Return+9.34%+10.49%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+12.43%+12.68%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+7.24%+9.50%Best
Volatility (annualized)7.3%Best7.9%
Max Drawdown-13.1%-11.8%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$14,184$15,742Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionApr 30, 2020Jun 30, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).

PMAY vs XBJL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.

Compare PMAY against instead:PMAY vs SPYPMAY vs QQQPMAY vs VOOPMAY vs VTIXBJL against:XBJL vs VXUS

PMAY vs XBJL Performance

Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year PMAY returned +9.34% while XBJL returned +10.49%. Year to date, PMAY is up 7.13% versus a gain of 7.79% for XBJL.

Over three years, PMAY compounded at +12.43% per year against +12.68% for XBJL; over five years the annualized figures are +7.24% and +9.50% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XBJL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.9% compared with 7.3% for PMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for PMAY and -11.8% for XBJL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PMAY charges 0.79% per year while XBJL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, PMAY currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XBJL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PMAY and XBJL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PMAYXBJL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PMAY or XBJL?

PMAY has an expense ratio of 0.79% while XBJL charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, PMAY or XBJL?

Over the past year PMAY returned +9.34% vs +10.49% for XBJL, so XBJL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PMAY or XBJL?

XBJL has been the more volatile fund at 7.9% annualized versus 7.3% for PMAY. Worst drawdown: PMAY -13.1% vs XBJL -11.8%.

Should I hold both PMAY and XBJL?

PMAY and XBJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PMAY or XBJL?

PMAY yields 0.00% while XBJL yields 0.00%, so XBJL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XBJL better than PMAY?

XBJL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.