PMNV vs QBSF
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November vs AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 ETF
Which is better, PMNV or QBSF?
QBSF has been ahead.
PMNV has a lower expense ratio. QBSF led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PMNV | QBSF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.64% |
| AUM | $5M | $64M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 7 | 15 |
| YTD Return | +5.39%Best | +4.99% |
| 1Y Return | +6.00% | +7.59%Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | AllianzIM |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2025 | Jun 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
PMNV vs QBSF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PMNV vs QBSF Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 ETF (QBSF) is an ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year PMNV returned +6.00% while QBSF returned +7.59%. Year to date, PMNV is up 5.39% versus a gain of 4.99% for QBSF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PMNV charges 0.50% per year while QBSF charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $64 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PMNV currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for QBSF.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PMNV and QBSF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PMNV or QBSF?
PMNV has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QBSF charges 0.64%. PMNV is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PMNV or QBSF?
Over the past year PMNV returned +6.00% vs +7.59% for QBSF, so QBSF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PMNV or QBSF?
PMNV yields 0.00% while QBSF yields 0.00%, so PMNV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QBSF better than PMNV?
PMNV has a lower expense ratio. QBSF led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.