PMOC vs VXUS
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, PMOC or VXUS?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PMOC | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $164.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 14 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | +5.46% | +11.26%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.58% | +18.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.3%Best | 14.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.5%Best | -11.3% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $10,626 | $11,667Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026 (1 years).
PMOC vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
PMOC vs VXUS Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October (PMOC) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PMOC returned +6.58% while VXUS returned +18.37%. Year to date, PMOC is up 5.46% versus a gain of 11.26% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 2.3% for PMOC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.5% for PMOC and -11.3% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PMOC charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PMOC currently yields 0.00% against 2.51% for VXUS.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PMOC and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PMOC or VXUS?
PMOC has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PMOC or VXUS?
Over the past year PMOC returned +6.58% vs +18.37% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), PMOC annualized +6.26% vs +16.67% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PMOC or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 2.3% for PMOC. Worst drawdown: PMOC -1.5% vs VXUS -11.3%.
Should I hold both PMOC and VXUS?
PMOC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PMOC or VXUS?
PMOC yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than PMOC?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.