PMTL vs QQQ
First Trust Indxx Quality Precious Metals Miners ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, PMTL or QQQ?
Precious Metals against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. PMTL is less concentrated, with 35.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PMTL | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 75 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +10.11% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.8%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Precious Metals | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PMTL vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PMTL vs QQQ Performance
First Trust Indxx Quality Precious Metals Miners ETF (PMTL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, PMTL is up 10.11% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PMTL charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PMTL currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 74 holdings in PMTL and 101 in QQQ, totalling 99.5% and 99.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in PMTL and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 75 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for PMTL (96.3% of the fund), and 10 for PMTL that do not appear in QQQ (19.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PMTL and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PMTL or QQQ?
PMTL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, PMTL or QQQ?
PMTL yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than PMTL?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. PMTL is less concentrated, with 35.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.