POCT vs XBJA
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - October vs Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January
Which is better, POCT or XBJA?
POCT has been ahead.
POCT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | POCT | XBJA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Tie | 0.79%Tie |
| AUM | $1.1B | $94M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 18 | 21 |
| YTD Return | +9.70%Best | +8.88% |
| 1Y Return | +12.26%Best | +11.38% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.93%Best | +11.68% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.10% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7%Best | 9.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.2%Best | -17.4% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $15,801Best | $14,062 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2018 | Dec 31, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 3, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.8 years).
POCT vs XBJA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
POCT vs XBJA Performance
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - October (POCT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year POCT returned +12.26% while XBJA returned +11.38%. Year to date, POCT is up 9.70% versus a gain of 8.88% for XBJA.
Over three years, POCT compounded at +11.93% per year against +11.68% for XBJA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XBJA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.9% compared with 6.7% for POCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.2% for POCT and -17.4% for XBJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
POCT charges 0.79% per year while XBJA charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, POCT currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XBJA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of POCT and XBJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, POCT or XBJA?
POCT has an expense ratio of 0.79% while XBJA charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, POCT or XBJA?
Over the past year POCT returned +12.26% vs +11.38% for XBJA, so POCT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, POCT or XBJA?
XBJA has been the more volatile fund at 9.9% annualized versus 6.7% for POCT. Worst drawdown: POCT -10.2% vs XBJA -17.4%.
Should I hold both POCT and XBJA?
POCT and XBJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, POCT or XBJA?
POCT yields 0.00% while XBJA yields 0.00%, so XBJA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBJA better than POCT?
POCT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.