POCT vs ZDEK

POCT vs ZDEK

Which is better, POCT or ZDEK?

POCT has been ahead.

POCT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: POCT

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPOCTZDEK
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$1.1B$107M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1815
YTD Return+9.70%Best+4.72%
1Y Return+12.26%Best+6.69%
3Y Return (annualized)+11.93%-
5Y Return (annualized)+10.10%-
Volatility (annualized)6.0%2.8%Best
Max Drawdown-10.2%-3.4%Best
$10,000 over 1.9 years$12,101Best$11,265
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionSep 28, 2018Nov 29, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).

POCT vs ZDEK growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

Compare POCT against instead:POCT vs SPYPOCT vs QQQPOCT vs VOOPOCT vs VTIZDEK against:ZDEK vs VXUS

POCT vs ZDEK Performance

Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - October (POCT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr December (ZDEK) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year POCT returned +12.26% while ZDEK returned +6.69%. Year to date, POCT is up 9.70% versus a gain of 4.72% for ZDEK.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

POCT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.0% compared with 2.8% for ZDEK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.2% for POCT and -3.4% for ZDEK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

POCT charges 0.79% per year while ZDEK charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, POCT currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ZDEK.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of POCT and ZDEK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

POCTZDEK

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, POCT or ZDEK?

POCT has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ZDEK charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, POCT or ZDEK?

Over the past year POCT returned +12.26% vs +6.69% for ZDEK, so POCT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), POCT annualized +10.56% vs +6.47% for ZDEK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, POCT or ZDEK?

POCT has been the more volatile fund at 6.0% annualized versus 2.8% for ZDEK. Worst drawdown: POCT -10.2% vs ZDEK -3.4%.

Should I hold both POCT and ZDEK?

POCT and ZDEK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, POCT or ZDEK?

POCT yields 0.00% while ZDEK yields 0.00%, so ZDEK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZDEK better than POCT?

POCT led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.