PPI vs VTI
Astoria Real Assets ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PPI or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PPI led over the full window, VTI over 1Y and 3Y. PPI is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PPI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $159M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 86 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +7.41% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.85% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.70% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $17,774Best | $16,639 |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.2%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | AXS Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 30, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.8 years).
PPI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
PPI vs VTI Performance
Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) is an ETF from AXS Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PPI returned +7.85% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, PPI is up 7.41% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, PPI compounded at +17.70% per year against +21.97% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PPI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 15.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for PPI and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PPI charges 0.57% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PPI currently yields 1.47% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
57.9% of PPI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.7% of VTI's money is in holdings PPI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
45 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in PPI and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 86 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,112 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PPI (92.9% of the fund), and 6 for PPI that do not appear in VTI (8.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PPI | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 2.66% | 0.90% | 1.76% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 2.87% | 0.50% | 2.37% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 2.57% | 0.33% | 2.24% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 2.55% | 0.15% | 2.40% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 1.94% | 0.18% | 1.76% |
| LMTLockheed Martin | 1.88% | 0.18% | 1.70% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 1.85% | 0.13% | 1.72% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 1.75% | 0.13% | 1.62% |
| STLDSteel Dynamics Inc | 1.76% | 0.04% | 1.72% |
| PSAPublic Storage | 1.73% | 0.07% | 1.66% |
57.9% of PPI is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PPI or VTI?
PPI has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PPI or VTI?
Over the past year PPI returned +7.85% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PPI or VTI?
PPI has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 15.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PPI -24.5% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both PPI and VTI?
PPI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PPI and VTI?
57.9% of PPI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.7% of VTI's is in holdings PPI also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in PPI and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PPI or VTI?
PPI yields 1.47% while VTI yields 1.06%, so PPI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PPI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PPI led over the full window, VTI over 1Y and 3Y. PPI is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.