PRTO vs VYM
RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PRTO or VYM?
Tactical Allocation against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 90.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRTO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.82% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 40 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +6.15% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.96% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Top 10 Weight | 90.4% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | RCN Wealth Advisors, Inc. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Tactical Allocation | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 24, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PRTO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PRTO vs VYM Performance
RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF (PRTO) is an ETF from RCN Wealth Advisors, Inc. and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PRTO is up 6.15% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRTO charges 0.82% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $82 vs $4 annually, a gap of $78 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRTO currently yields 0.00% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
4.4% of PRTO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.5% of VYM's money is in holdings PRTO also owns.
PRTO and VYM share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 19 positions we hold weights for in PRTO and 602 in VYM, against full books of 40 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 569 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PRTO (95.4% of the fund), and 15 for PRTO that do not appear in VYM (95.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PRTO and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRTO or VYM?
PRTO has an expense ratio of 0.82% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $78 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PRTO and VYM?
4.4% of PRTO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.5% of VYM's is in holdings PRTO also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 19 positions we hold weights for in PRTO and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRTO or VYM?
PRTO yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PRTO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 90.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.