PRVS vs TALV
Parnassus Value Select ETF vs Transamerica Large Value Active ETF
Which is better, PRVS or TALV?
TALV costs less.
TALV has a lower expense ratio. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRVS | TALV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $28M | $178M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 0.73% |
| Holdings | 56 | 70 |
| YTD Return | +15.17%Best | +14.25% |
| 1Y Return | +21.88% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.7% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Parnassus Investments | Transamerica |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2024 | Dec 15, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PRVS vs TALV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PRVS vs TALV Performance
Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) is an ETF from Parnassus Investments and Transamerica Large Value Active ETF (TALV) is an ETF from Transamerica. Year to date, PRVS is up 15.17% versus a gain of 14.25% for TALV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRVS charges 0.59% per year while TALV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $49 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRVS currently yields 0.52% against 0.73% for TALV.
Holdings Overlap
52.6% of PRVS's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 27.2% of TALV's money is in holdings PRVS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in PRVS and 68 in TALV, against full books of 56 and 70.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 27 and 68 positions we hold weights for.
PRVS holds 12 positions TALV does not, 35.4% of the fund.
Largest: V 4.10%, UNP 3.90%, CBRE 3.50%, LIN 3.30%, CMI 3.00%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PRVS | Weight in TALV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.00% | 5.51% | 2.49% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.50% | 5.28% | 2.22% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.00% | 4.00% | 0.00% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.90% | 1.48% | 3.42% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 4.00% | 1.81% | 2.19% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 3.40% | 1.88% | 1.52% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 4.30% | 0.81% | 3.49% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 3.60% | 1.35% | 2.25% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 3.50% | 1.43% | 2.07% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.90% | 0.84% | 3.06% |
52.6% of PRVS is already inside TALV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRVS or TALV?
PRVS has an expense ratio of 0.59% while TALV charges 0.49%. TALV is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PRVS and TALV?
52.6% of PRVS's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 27.2% of TALV's is in holdings PRVS also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in PRVS and 68 in TALV.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRVS or TALV?
PRVS yields 0.52% while TALV yields 0.73%, so TALV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TALV better than PRVS?
TALV has a lower expense ratio. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.