PRXV vs QQQ
Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, PRXV or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. PRXV is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRXV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $92M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.56% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 277 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +16.02% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.81% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6%Best | 19.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.7%Best | -12.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $14,510 | $17,533Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.0%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | Praxis Mutual Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 8, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
PRXV vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
PRXV vs QQQ Performance
Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) is an ETF from Praxis Mutual Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PRXV returned +19.81% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, PRXV is up 16.02% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 9.6% for PRXV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.7% for PRXV and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRXV charges 0.36% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $18 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRXV currently yields 1.56% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
20.0% of PRXV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 72.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings PRXV also owns.
Most of QQQ is already inside PRXV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
54 positions in common, counted across the 271 positions we hold weights for in PRXV and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 277 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 38 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for PRXV (23.6% of the fund), and 212 for PRXV that do not appear in QQQ (78.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PRXV | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.60% | 5.02% | 0.42% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 0.08% | 8.33% | 8.25% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.33% | 7.35% | 7.02% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 0.50% | 5.76% | 5.26% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 0.06% | 4.17% | 4.11% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.12% | 4.07% | 3.95% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.81% | 2.11% | 0.30% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.64% | 1.77% | 0.13% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 0.09% | 3.26% | 3.17% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc-cl A | 0.09% | 3.05% | 2.96% |
72.7% of QQQ is already inside PRXV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRXV or QQQ?
PRXV has an expense ratio of 0.36% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PRXV or QQQ?
Over the past year PRXV returned +19.81% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PRXV annualized +28.17% vs +45.40% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PRXV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 9.6% for PRXV. Worst drawdown: PRXV -6.7% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both PRXV and QQQ?
PRXV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PRXV and QQQ?
72.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings PRXV also owns. 72.7% of QQQ's is in holdings PRXV also owns. They hold 54 positions in common, counted across the 271 positions we hold weights for in PRXV and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRXV or QQQ?
PRXV yields 1.56% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so PRXV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than PRXV?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. PRXV is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.