PSCE vs VTI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PSCE or VTI?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PSCE led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCE | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $108M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 72 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +38.04%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +46.17%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.74% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.11% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.7% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -96.3% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,186 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.6% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2010 to Oct 14, 2026 (16.5 years).
PSCE vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.5 years both funds cover.
PSCE vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCE returned +46.17% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, PSCE is up 38.04% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, PSCE compounded at +3.74% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.11% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.25% annualized vs -3.86%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.7% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.3% for PSCE and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCE charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCE currently yields 2.52% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.0% of PSCE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings PSCE also owns.
Most of PSCE is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
33 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PSCE and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 72 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,140 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PSCE (97.4% of the fund), and 2 for PSCE that do not appear in VTI (2.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PSCE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMSm Energy Co | 7.34% | 0.01% | 7.33% |
| MGYMagnolia Oil & Gas Corp, Class A | 5.00% | 0.01% | 4.99% |
| KGSKodiak Gas Services Inc | 4.81% | 0.01% | 4.80% |
| AROCArchrock, Inc. | 4.66% | 0.01% | 4.65% |
| NENoble Corp Plc Ordinary Shares | 4.55% | 0.01% | 4.54% |
| SOISolaris Oilfield Infrastructure Inc Com Cl A | 4.32% | 0.00% | 4.32% |
| INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. | 4.22% | 0.01% | 4.21% |
| DKDelek Us Holdings Inc | 3.98% | 0.01% | 3.97% |
| WHDCactus Inc | 3.88% | 0.01% | 3.87% |
| CNRCore Natural Resources Inccommon Stock | 3.87% | 0.01% | 3.86% |
98.0% of PSCE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCE or VTI?
PSCE has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSCE or VTI?
Over the past year PSCE returned +46.17% vs +16.63% for VTI, so PSCE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), PSCE annualized -3.86% vs +12.25% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSCE or VTI?
PSCE has been the more volatile fund at 40.7% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PSCE -96.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both PSCE and VTI?
PSCE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCE and VTI?
98.0% of PSCE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings PSCE also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PSCE and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCE or VTI?
PSCE yields 2.52% while VTI yields 1.06%, so PSCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PSCE?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PSCE led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.