PSFF vs PSFJ
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF vs Pacer Swan SOS Flex July ETF
Which is better, PSFF or PSFJ?
Nearly the same fund. PSFJ costs less.
PSFJ has a lower expense ratio. PSFF led over 1Y, PSFJ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSFF | PSFJ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $631M | $58M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 26 | 13 |
| YTD Return | +9.07%Best | +9.04% |
| 1Y Return | +11.80%Best | +11.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.01% | +15.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.68% | +11.49%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5%Best | 9.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.8%Best | -12.2% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,872 | $17,226Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2020 | Jun 30, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
PSFF vs PSFJ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
PSFF vs PSFJ Performance
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Pacer Swan SOS Flex July ETF (PSFJ) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year PSFF returned +11.80% while PSFJ returned +11.77%. Year to date, PSFF is up 9.07% versus a gain of 9.04% for PSFJ.
Over three years, PSFF compounded at +13.01% per year against +15.29% for PSFJ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.68% and +11.49% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSFJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.3% compared with 7.5% for PSFF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.8% for PSFF and -12.2% for PSFJ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSFF charges 0.66% per year while PSFJ charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $49 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSFF currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PSFJ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PSFF and PSFJ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSFF or PSFJ?
PSFF has an expense ratio of 0.66% while PSFJ charges 0.49%. PSFJ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSFF or PSFJ?
Over the past year PSFF returned +11.80% vs +11.77% for PSFJ, so PSFF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSFF or PSFJ?
PSFJ has been the more volatile fund at 9.3% annualized versus 7.5% for PSFF. Worst drawdown: PSFF -10.8% vs PSFJ -12.2%.
Should I hold both PSFF and PSFJ?
PSFF and PSFJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSFF or PSFJ?
PSFF yields 0.00% while PSFJ yields 0.00%, so PSFJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSFJ better than PSFF?
PSFJ has a lower expense ratio. PSFF led over 1Y, PSFJ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.