PSFF vs TBG
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF vs TBG Dividend Focus ETF
Which is better, PSFF or TBG?
TBG has been ahead.
TBG has a lower expense ratio. TBG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. TBG is less concentrated, with 39.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 92.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSFF | TBG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.45%Best |
| AUM | $631M | $284M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.82% |
| Holdings | 26 | 78 |
| YTD Return | +9.07% | +12.11%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.80% | +15.30%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.01% | +17.15%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.68% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3%Best | 12.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.8%Best | -14.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $14,327 | $15,825Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 92.5% | 39.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | EA Series Trust |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2020 | Nov 6, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
PSFF vs TBG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
PSFF vs TBG Performance
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) is an ETF from EA Series Trust. Over the past year PSFF returned +11.80% while TBG returned +15.30%. Year to date, PSFF is up 9.07% versus a gain of 12.11% for TBG.
Over three years, PSFF compounded at +13.01% per year against +17.15% for TBG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TBG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 5.3% for PSFF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.8% for PSFF and -14.8% for TBG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSFF charges 0.66% per year while TBG charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $45 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSFF currently yields 0.00% against 2.82% for TBG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 12 holdings in PSFF and 38 in TBG, totalling 99.6% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in PSFF and 38 in TBG, against full books of 26 and 78.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 37 positions for TBG that do not appear in our book for PSFF (98.3% of the fund), and 12 for PSFF that do not appear in TBG (99.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PSFF and TBG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSFF or TBG?
PSFF has an expense ratio of 0.66% while TBG charges 0.45%. TBG is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSFF or TBG?
Over the past year PSFF returned +11.80% vs +15.30% for TBG, so TBG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSFF or TBG?
TBG has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 5.3% for PSFF. Worst drawdown: PSFF -10.8% vs TBG -14.8%.
Should I hold both PSFF and TBG?
PSFF and TBG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSFF or TBG?
PSFF yields 0.00% while TBG yields 2.82%, so TBG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TBG better than PSFF?
TBG has a lower expense ratio. TBG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. TBG is less concentrated, with 39.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 92.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.