PSIL vs RFDA
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF vs ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
Which is better, PSIL or RFDA?
RFDA has been ahead.
RFDA has a lower expense ratio. RFDA led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RFDA is less concentrated, with 30.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSIL | RFDA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.52%Best |
| AUM | $44M | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.45% | 2.00% |
| Holdings | 33 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +16.80%Best | +14.73% |
| 1Y Return | +9.75% | +16.68%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.39% | +20.07%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -23.59% | +12.87%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 49.1% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -92.7% | -19.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $2,605 | $18,319Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 64.2% | 30.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2021 | Jun 6, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.1 years).
PSIL vs RFDA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
PSIL vs RFDA Performance
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is an ETF from Advisor Shares and ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year PSIL returned +9.75% while RFDA returned +16.68%. Year to date, PSIL is up 16.80% versus a gain of 14.73% for RFDA.
Over three years, PSIL compounded at +14.39% per year against +20.07% for RFDA; over five years the annualized figures are -23.59% and +12.87% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.1% compared with 14.5% for RFDA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.7% for PSIL and -19.4% for RFDA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSIL charges 1.00% per year while RFDA charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $52 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSIL currently yields 7.45% against 2.00% for RFDA.
Holdings Overlap
9.0% of PSIL's money is in holdings RFDA also owns. 3.6% of RFDA's money is in holdings PSIL also owns.
PSIL and RFDA share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PSIL and 75 in RFDA, against full books of 33 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 70 positions for RFDA that do not appear in our book for PSIL (92.9% of the fund), and 17 for PSIL that do not appear in RFDA (53.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PSIL and RFDA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSIL or RFDA?
PSIL has an expense ratio of 1.00% while RFDA charges 0.52%. RFDA is the cheaper option, by $48 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSIL or RFDA?
Over the past year PSIL returned +9.75% vs +16.68% for RFDA, so RFDA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSIL or RFDA?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 49.1% annualized versus 14.5% for RFDA. Worst drawdown: PSIL -92.7% vs RFDA -19.4%.
Should I hold both PSIL and RFDA?
PSIL and RFDA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PSIL and RFDA?
9.0% of PSIL's money is in holdings RFDA also owns. 3.6% of RFDA's is in holdings PSIL also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PSIL and 75 in RFDA.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSIL or RFDA?
PSIL yields 7.45% while RFDA yields 2.00%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RFDA better than PSIL?
RFDA has a lower expense ratio. RFDA led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RFDA is less concentrated, with 30.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.