PSIL vs WBIF
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF vs WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
Which is better, PSIL or WBIF?
Each has led over a different period.
PSIL has a lower expense ratio. PSIL led over 3Y, WBIF over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSIL | WBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00%Best | 1.65% |
| AUM | $44M | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.45% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 33 | 152 |
| YTD Return | +16.80%Best | +14.87% |
| 1Y Return | +9.75% | +15.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.39%Best | +10.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -23.59% | +4.01%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 49.1% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -92.7% | -20.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $2,605 | $12,172Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2021 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.1 years).
PSIL vs WBIF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
PSIL vs WBIF Performance
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is an ETF from Advisor Shares and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year PSIL returned +9.75% while WBIF returned +15.37%. Year to date, PSIL is up 16.80% versus a gain of 14.87% for WBIF.
Over three years, PSIL compounded at +14.39% per year against +10.35% for WBIF; over five years the annualized figures are -23.59% and +4.01% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.1% compared with 12.8% for WBIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.7% for PSIL and -20.3% for WBIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSIL charges 1.00% per year while WBIF charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $165 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSIL currently yields 7.45% against 0.00% for WBIF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 29 holdings in PSIL and 62 in WBIF, totalling 100.0% and 83.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PSIL and 62 in WBIF, against full books of 33 and 152.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PSIL and WBIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSIL or WBIF?
PSIL has an expense ratio of 1.00% while WBIF charges 1.65%. PSIL is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSIL or WBIF?
Over the past year PSIL returned +9.75% vs +15.37% for WBIF, so WBIF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSIL or WBIF?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 49.1% annualized versus 12.8% for WBIF. Worst drawdown: PSIL -92.7% vs WBIF -20.3%.
Should I hold both PSIL and WBIF?
PSIL and WBIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSIL or WBIF?
PSIL yields 7.45% while WBIF yields 0.00%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIF better than PSIL?
PSIL has a lower expense ratio. PSIL led over 3Y, WBIF over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.