PSIL vs ZAP
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Which is better, PSIL or ZAP?
PSIL has been ahead.
ZAP has a lower expense ratio. PSIL led over 1Y and the full window. ZAP is less concentrated, with 44.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSIL | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $44M | $440M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.45% | 1.74% |
| Holdings | 33 | 94 |
| YTD Return | +16.80%Best | +6.45% |
| 1Y Return | +9.75%Best | +2.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.39% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -23.59% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.4% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.6% | -13.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $21,027Best | $13,487 |
| Top 10 Weight | 64.2% | 44.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2021 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
PSIL vs ZAP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
PSIL vs ZAP Performance
ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is an ETF from Advisor Shares and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year PSIL returned +9.75% while ZAP returned +2.72%. Year to date, PSIL is up 16.80% versus a gain of 6.45% for ZAP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.4% compared with 15.2% for ZAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.6% for PSIL and -13.0% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSIL charges 1.00% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $50 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSIL currently yields 7.45% against 1.74% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 29 holdings in PSIL and 45 in ZAP, totalling 100.0% and 100.4% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in PSIL and 45 in ZAP, against full books of 33 and 94.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 44 positions for ZAP that do not appear in our book for PSIL (98.8% of the fund), and 19 for PSIL that do not appear in ZAP (62.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PSIL and ZAP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSIL or ZAP?
PSIL has an expense ratio of 1.00% while ZAP charges 0.50%. ZAP is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSIL or ZAP?
Over the past year PSIL returned +9.75% vs +2.72% for ZAP, so PSIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PSIL annualized +51.12% vs +18.08% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSIL or ZAP?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 30.4% annualized versus 15.2% for ZAP. Worst drawdown: PSIL -34.6% vs ZAP -13.0%.
Should I hold both PSIL and ZAP?
PSIL and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSIL or ZAP?
PSIL yields 7.45% while ZAP yields 1.74%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZAP better than PSIL?
ZAP has a lower expense ratio. PSIL led over 1Y and the full window. ZAP is less concentrated, with 44.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.