PSR vs VTI

PSR vs VTI

Which is better, PSR or VTI?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.9%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPSRVTI
Expense Ratio0.35%0.03%Best
AUM$56M$689.2B
Dividend Yield2.82%1.06%
Holdings723,524
YTD Return+9.99%+13.02%Best
1Y Return+9.48%+16.63%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+9.72%+21.97%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+0.71%+11.99%Best
Volatility (annualized)21.4%15.3%Best
Max Drawdown-43.0%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$10,360$17,616Best
Top 10 Weight60.9%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 20, 2008May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 21, 2008 to Oct 14, 2026 (17.9 years).

PSR vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.9 years both funds cover.

PSR vs VTI Performance

Invesco Active US Real Estate ETF (PSR) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSR returned +9.48% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, PSR is up 9.99% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Over three years, PSR compounded at +9.72% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.71% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.97% annualized vs +10.06%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.0% for PSR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PSR charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSR currently yields 2.82% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

PSR already in VTI100.0%
VTI already in PSR1.3%

100.0% of PSR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.3% of VTI's money is in holdings PSR also owns.

Most of PSR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

32 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in PSR and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 72 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,126 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PSR (96.3% of the fund), and 0 for PSR that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PSRWeight in VTIDifference
WELLWelltower, Inc.10.82%0.23%10.59%
PLDPrologis Inc9.24%0.18%9.06%
EQIXEquinix, Inc.8.20%0.14%8.06%
AMTAmerican Tower Corp7.27%0.11%7.16%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.6.35%0.09%6.26%
TRNOTerreno Realty Corp4.63%0.01%4.62%
CPTCamden Property Trust Common Stock4.00%0.01%3.99%
UDRUdr Inc.3.79%0.02%3.77%
PSAPublic Storage Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust3.72%0.07%3.65%
SPGSimon Property Group Inc2.84%0.09%2.75%

100.0% of PSR is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PSRVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PSR or VTI?

PSR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PSR or VTI?

Over the past year PSR returned +9.48% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), PSR annualized +10.06% vs +13.97% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PSR or VTI?

PSR has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PSR -43.0% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both PSR and VTI?

PSR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between PSR and VTI?

100.0% of PSR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.3% of VTI's is in holdings PSR also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in PSR and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, PSR or VTI?

PSR yields 2.82% while VTI yields 1.06%, so PSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than PSR?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.