PZIV vs VTI

PZIV vs VTI

Which is better, PZIV or VTI?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. PZIV is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: PZIV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPZIVVTI
Expense Ratio0.70%0.03%Best
AUM$15M$690.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings1623,524
YTD Return+15.37%Best+14.35%
1Y Return-+17.97%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.47%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.62%
Top 10 Weight28.8%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyPzena FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 1, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PZIV vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PZIV vs VTI Performance

Pzena International Value ETF (PZIV) is an ETF from Pzena Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PZIV is up 15.37% versus a gain of 14.35% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PZIV charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PZIV currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

PZIV already in VTI4.2%
VTI already in PZIV0.3%

4.2% of PZIV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.3% of VTI's money is in holdings PZIV also owns.

PZIV and VTI share little of their money.

The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, PZIV as of Sep 17, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

2 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in PZIV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 162 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,148 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PZIV (97.2% of the fund), and 1 for PZIV that do not appear in VTI (3.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PZIVWeight in VTIDifference
ACNAccenture Plc3.00%0.14%2.86%
MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares1.20%0.15%1.05%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PZIV and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PZIVVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PZIV or VTI?

PZIV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PZIV and VTI?

4.2% of PZIV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.3% of VTI's is in holdings PZIV also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in PZIV and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, PZIV or VTI?

PZIV yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than PZIV?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. PZIV is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.