QBTZ vs VTI
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QBTZ or VTI?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.58, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBTZ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.31% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -75.36% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -80.95% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 189.6% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -96.6% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $1,091 | $11,534Best |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Debt | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 7, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
QBTZ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QBTZ vs VTI Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QBTZ returned -80.95% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, QBTZ is down 75.36% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QBTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 189.6% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.6% for QBTZ and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.58. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBTZ charges 2.31% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $231 vs $3 annually, a gap of $228 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBTZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in QBTZ and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 0.1% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in QBTZ and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 7 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QBTZ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBTZ or VTI?
QBTZ has an expense ratio of 2.31% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $228 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QBTZ or VTI?
Over the past year QBTZ returned -80.95% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QBTZ annualized -89.09% vs +15.34% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QBTZ or VTI?
QBTZ has been the more volatile fund at 189.6% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QBTZ -96.6% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both QBTZ and VTI?
QBTZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.58, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBTZ or VTI?
QBTZ yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QBTZ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.58, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.