QCOC vs QMNV

QCOC vs QMNV

Which is better, QCOC or QMNV?

QMNV has been ahead.

QMNV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: QMNV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQCOCQMNV
Expense Ratio0.90%Tie0.90%Tie
AUM$63M$45M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1010
YTD Return+10.00%+10.90%Best
1Y Return+11.60%+16.04%Best
Volatility (annualized)6.6%Best7.8%
Max Drawdown-10.4%Best-12.8%
$10,000 over 1.9 years$12,354$12,979Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionOct 18, 2024Nov 15, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).

QCOC vs QMNV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

Compare QCOC against instead:QCOC vs SPYQCOC vs QQQQCOC vs VOOQCOC vs VTIQMNV against:QMNV vs VXUS

QCOC vs QMNV Performance

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - October (QCOC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - November (QMNV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QCOC returned +11.60% while QMNV returned +16.04%. Year to date, QCOC is up 10.00% versus a gain of 10.90% for QMNV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QMNV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.8% compared with 6.6% for QCOC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for QCOC and -12.8% for QMNV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QCOC charges 0.90% per year while QMNV charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $90 annually. On income, QCOC currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for QMNV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QCOC and QMNV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QCOCQMNV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QCOC or QMNV?

QCOC has an expense ratio of 0.90% while QMNV charges 0.90%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, QCOC or QMNV?

Over the past year QCOC returned +11.60% vs +16.04% for QMNV, so QMNV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QCOC annualized +11.77% vs +14.71% for QMNV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QCOC or QMNV?

QMNV has been the more volatile fund at 7.8% annualized versus 6.6% for QCOC. Worst drawdown: QCOC -10.4% vs QMNV -12.8%.

Should I hold both QCOC and QMNV?

QCOC and QMNV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QCOC or QMNV?

QCOC yields 0.00% while QMNV yields 0.00%, so QMNV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QMNV better than QCOC?

QMNV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.