QDVO vs VOOG
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
Which is better, QDVO or VOOG?
Nearly the same fund. VOOG costs less.
VOOG has a lower expense ratio. VOOG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. QDVO is less concentrated, with 57.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDVO | VOOG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.07%Best |
| AUM | $787M | $27.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.44% | 0.45% |
| Holdings | 97 | 151 |
| YTD Return | +11.49% | +15.34%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.59% | +19.01%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +27.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.05% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3%Best | 16.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6%Best | -22.2% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,727 | $15,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.9%Best | 59.4% |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 22, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 22, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
QDVO vs VOOG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
QDVO vs VOOG Performance
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QDVO returned +14.59% while VOOG returned +19.01%. Year to date, QDVO is up 11.49% versus a gain of 15.34% for VOOG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 13.3% for QDVO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for QDVO and -22.2% for VOOG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDVO charges 0.56% per year while VOOG charges 0.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $7 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDVO currently yields 11.44% against 0.45% for VOOG.
Holdings Overlap
82.9% of QDVO's money is in holdings VOOG also owns. 69.1% of VOOG's money is in holdings QDVO also owns.
Most of QDVO is already inside VOOG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
25 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in QDVO and 149 in VOOG, against full books of 97 and 151.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 122 positions for VOOG that do not appear in our book for QDVO (30.6% of the fund), and 15 for QDVO that do not appear in VOOG (18.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QDVO | Weight in VOOG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.80% | 14.85% | 4.05% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.00% | 10.47% | 4.47% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.01% | 6.46% | 2.55% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 8.14% | 5.53% | 2.61% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.09% | 3.74% | 1.35% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.33% | 4.87% | 1.54% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.53% | 3.00% | 1.53% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.95% | 3.49% | 0.46% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.75% | 2.13% | 1.62% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.34% | 2.54% | 0.80% |
82.9% of QDVO is already inside VOOG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDVO or VOOG?
QDVO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VOOG charges 0.07%. VOOG is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QDVO or VOOG?
Over the past year QDVO returned +14.59% vs +19.01% for VOOG, so VOOG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QDVO annualized +20.24% vs +22.55% for VOOG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QDVO or VOOG?
VOOG has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 13.3% for QDVO. Worst drawdown: QDVO -18.6% vs VOOG -22.2%.
Should I hold both QDVO and VOOG?
QDVO and VOOG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QDVO and VOOG?
82.9% of QDVO's money is in holdings VOOG also owns. 69.1% of VOOG's is in holdings QDVO also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in QDVO and 149 in VOOG.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDVO or VOOG?
QDVO yields 11.44% while VOOG yields 0.45%, so QDVO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOOG better than QDVO?
VOOG has a lower expense ratio. VOOG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. QDVO is less concentrated, with 57.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.