QEW vs VTI

QEW vs VTI

Which is better, QEW or VTI?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. QEW is less concentrated, with 12.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: QEW

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQEWVTI
Expense Ratio0.25%0.03%Best
AUM$27M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.29%1.06%
Holdings2103,524
YTD Return+18.56%Best+13.02%
1Y Return-+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Top 10 Weight12.5%Best33.5%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 18, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QEW vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QEW vs VTI Performance

Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QEW is up 18.56% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QEW charges 0.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QEW currently yields 0.29% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

QEW already in VTI88.7%
VTI already in QEW47.8%

88.7% of QEW's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.8% of VTI's money is in holdings QEW also owns.

Most of QEW is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

90 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QEW and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 210 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,066 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QEW (49.8% of the fund), and 6 for QEW that do not appear in VTI (5.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QEWWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp1.06%6.88%5.82%
AAPLApple, Inc1.05%6.30%5.25%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp1.02%5.11%4.09%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc0.97%3.41%2.44%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.96%2.38%1.42%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc0.50%2.70%2.20%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.27%1.70%0.43%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C0.51%2.12%1.61%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.12%1.46%0.34%
TSLATesla Inc1.00%1.40%0.40%

88.7% of QEW is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QEWVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QEW or VTI?

QEW has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QEW and VTI?

88.7% of QEW's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.8% of VTI's is in holdings QEW also owns. They hold 90 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QEW and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, QEW or VTI?

QEW yields 0.29% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than QEW?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. QEW is less concentrated, with 12.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.