QFHD vs VYM

QFHD vs VYM

Which is better, QFHD or VYM?

VYM costs less.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. QFHD is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: QFHD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQFHDVYM
Expense Ratio0.49%0.04%Best
AUM$540,090.9$78.9B
Dividend Yield2.06%2.37%
Holdings198608
YTD Return+8.73%+11.83%Best
1Y Return-+15.96%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.60%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.51%
Top 10 Weight21.0%Best25.8%
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionJan 12, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QFHD vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QFHD vs VYM Performance

Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QFHD is up 8.73% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QFHD charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QFHD currently yields 2.06% against 2.37% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

QFHD already in VYM99.8%
VYM already in QFHD35.3%

99.8% of QFHD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 35.3% of VYM's money is in holdings QFHD also owns.

Most of QFHD is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

97 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in QFHD and 602 in VYM, against full books of 198 and 608.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 476 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for QFHD (62.5% of the fund), and 0 for QFHD that do not appear in VYM (0.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QFHDWeight in VYMDifference
XOMExxonmobil Corp.0.90%2.70%1.80%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common0.78%2.58%1.80%
PFEPfizer Inc2.20%0.65%1.55%
BBYBest Buy Co Inc2.74%0.06%2.68%
CVXChevron Corp1.25%1.54%0.29%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares0.91%1.76%0.85%
SWKSSkyworks Solutions Inc.2.52%0.04%2.48%
MRKMerck & Company Inc1.09%1.47%0.38%
KOCoca Cola Co.1.12%1.39%0.27%
PRUPrudential Financial Inc2.29%0.16%2.13%

99.8% of QFHD is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QFHDVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QFHD or VYM?

QFHD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QFHD and VYM?

99.8% of QFHD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 35.3% of VYM's is in holdings QFHD also owns. They hold 97 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in QFHD and 602 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, QFHD or VYM?

QFHD yields 2.06% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than QFHD?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. QFHD is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.