QGRO vs VTI
American Century US Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QGRO or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QGRO led over the full window, VTI over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. QGRO is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QGRO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.0B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 427 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +3.54% | +14.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.91% | +17.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.42% | +22.47%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.04% | +12.62%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 17.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -32.6%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,881 | $18,117Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.2%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 10, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2018 to Oct 13, 2026 (8.1 years).
QGRO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.1 years both funds cover.
QGRO vs VTI Performance
American Century US Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is an ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QGRO returned +4.91% while VTI returned +17.97%. Year to date, QGRO is up 3.54% versus a gain of 14.35% for VTI.
Over three years, QGRO compounded at +20.42% per year against +22.47% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.04% and +12.62% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QGRO has the edge at +14.53% annualized vs +13.39%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 17.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.6% for QGRO and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QGRO charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QGRO currently yields 0.18% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.3% of QGRO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 44.6% of VTI's money is in holdings QGRO also owns.
Most of QGRO is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
183 positions in common, counted across the 187 positions we hold weights for in QGRO and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 427 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 972 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QGRO (53.0% of the fund), and 3 for QGRO that do not appear in VTI (1.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QGRO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.79% | 6.29% | 2.50% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.08% | 4.79% | 1.71% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.97% | 3.65% | 0.68% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.30% | 2.90% | 0.40% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.71% | 1.35% | 1.36% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.27% | 0.63% | 2.64% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.16% | 1.29% | 0.87% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.32% | 1.70% | 0.38% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 2.68% | 0.27% | 2.41% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 2.54% | 0.27% | 2.27% |
96.3% of QGRO is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QGRO or VTI?
QGRO has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QGRO or VTI?
Over the past year QGRO returned +4.91% vs +17.97% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QGRO annualized +14.53% vs +13.39% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QGRO or VTI?
QGRO has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 17.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QGRO -32.6% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both QGRO and VTI?
QGRO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QGRO and VTI?
96.3% of QGRO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 44.6% of VTI's is in holdings QGRO also owns. They hold 183 positions in common, counted across the 187 positions we hold weights for in QGRO and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QGRO or VTI?
QGRO yields 0.18% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QGRO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QGRO led over the full window, VTI over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. QGRO is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.