QIDX vs QLTY
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, QIDX or QLTY?
QLTY has been ahead.
QLTY led over 1Y and the full window. QIDX is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QIDX | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $39M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.93% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 264 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +7.85% | +14.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.18% | +20.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.84% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0%Best | -17.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,722 | $13,970Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.2%Best | 45.5% |
| Fund Family | Indexperts | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2024 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
QIDX vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
QIDX vs QLTY Performance
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) is an ETF from Indexperts and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Over the past year QIDX returned +7.18% while QLTY returned +20.95%. Year to date, QIDX is up 7.85% versus a gain of 14.13% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QLTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 9.9% for QIDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for QIDX and -17.0% for QLTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QIDX charges 0.50% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, QIDX currently yields 0.93% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
17.8% of QIDX's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 40.3% of QLTY's money is in holdings QIDX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in QIDX and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 264 and 90.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 31 positions for QLTY that do not appear in our book for QIDX (59.4% of the fund), and 116 for QIDX that do not appear in QLTY (81.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QIDX | Weight in QLTY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 0.69% | 8.00% | 7.31% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.22% | 4.90% | 1.68% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 3.25% | 4.30% | 1.05% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.42% | 4.20% | 1.78% |
| KLACKla-tencor | 1.71% | 2.70% | 0.99% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.01% | 2.50% | 1.49% |
| ABTAbbot Laboratories | 1.08% | 2.20% | 1.12% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.56% | 2.40% | 1.84% |
| HLTHilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.78% | 1.70% | 0.92% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 0.35% | 2.10% | 1.75% |
40.3% of QLTY is already inside QIDX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QIDX or QLTY?
QIDX has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QLTY charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, QIDX or QLTY?
Over the past year QIDX returned +7.18% vs +20.95% for QLTY, so QLTY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QIDX annualized +9.23% vs +20.41% for QLTY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QIDX or QLTY?
QLTY has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 9.9% for QIDX. Worst drawdown: QIDX -15.0% vs QLTY -17.0%.
Should I hold both QIDX and QLTY?
QIDX and QLTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QIDX and QLTY?
40.3% of QLTY's money is in holdings QIDX also owns. 40.3% of QLTY's is in holdings QIDX also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in QIDX and 45 in QLTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, QIDX or QLTY?
QIDX yields 0.93% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so QIDX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than QIDX?
QLTY led over 1Y and the full window. QIDX is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.