QLD vs XQQI
ProShares Ultra QQQ vs NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
Which is better, QLD or XQQI?
QLD costs less.
QLD has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QLD | XQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89%Best | 0.98% |
| AUM | $15.2B | $381M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 11.96% |
| Holdings | 127 | 213 |
| YTD Return | +32.18%Best | +14.06% |
| 1Y Return | +36.70% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +43.74% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.62% | - |
| Fund Family | ProShares | NEOS |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2006 | Feb 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QLD vs XQQI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QLD vs XQQI Performance
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is an ETF from ProShares and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, QLD is up 32.18% versus a gain of 14.06% for XQQI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QLD charges 0.89% per year while XQQI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $98 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QLD currently yields 0.13% against 11.96% for XQQI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 94.7% of XQQI's money is in holdings QLD also owns.
Stated as a floor: for QLD, our book for it covers 75.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of XQQI is already inside QLD. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
94 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QLD and 102 in XQQI, against full books of 127 and 213.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QLD | Weight in XQQI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.56% | 8.55% | 2.99% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.80% | 7.42% | 2.62% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 3.79% | 5.76% | 1.97% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.30% | 5.27% | 1.97% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 2.82% | 4.29% | 1.47% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.67% | 4.13% | 1.46% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.13% | 3.32% | 1.19% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc-cl A | 1.99% | 3.04% | 1.05% |
| GOOGAlphabet, Inc.- Cl C | 1.85% | 2.82% | 0.97% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 1.92% | 2.74% | 0.82% |
94.7% of XQQI is already inside QLD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QLD or XQQI?
QLD has an expense ratio of 0.89% while XQQI charges 0.98%. QLD is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QLD and XQQI?
At least 94.7% of XQQI's money is in holdings QLD also owns. Our book for QLD is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 94 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QLD and 102 in XQQI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QLD or XQQI?
QLD yields 0.13% while XQQI yields 11.96%, so XQQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XQQI better than QLD?
QLD has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.