QLTY vs TOAO
GMO US Quality ETF vs Twin Oak Active Opportunities III ETF
Which is better, QLTY or TOAO?
QLTY costs less.
QLTY has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QLTY | TOAO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $5.4B | $452M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.66% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 90 | 49 |
| YTD Return | +14.13%Best | +8.07% |
| 1Y Return | +20.95% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.84% | - |
| Fund Family | GMO | Twin Oak |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 13, 2023 | Apr 24, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QLTY vs TOAO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QLTY vs TOAO Performance
GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO and Twin Oak Active Opportunities III ETF (TOAO) is an ETF from Twin Oak. Year to date, QLTY is up 14.13% versus a gain of 8.07% for TOAO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QLTY charges 0.50% per year while TOAO charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $95 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QLTY currently yields 0.66% against 0.00% for TOAO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 30.3% of QLTY's money is in holdings TOAO also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for TOAO, our book for it lists positions totalling 109.2% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in QLTY and 28 in TOAO, against full books of 90 and 49.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QLTY | Weight in TOAO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.00% | 5.66% | 2.34% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.50% | 7.15% | 3.65% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.30% | 6.55% | 3.25% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.70% | 5.72% | 2.02% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.80% | 4.26% | 0.54% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.80% | 2.72% | 0.08% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 2.40% | 1.17% | 1.23% |
| MCOMoody'S Corp. | 0.70% | 2.39% | 1.69% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 1.10% | 1.73% | 0.63% |
30.3% of QLTY is already inside TOAO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QLTY or TOAO?
QLTY has an expense ratio of 0.50% while TOAO charges 0.95%. QLTY is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QLTY and TOAO?
At least 30.3% of QLTY's money is in holdings TOAO also owns. Our book for TOAO is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in QLTY and 28 in TOAO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QLTY or TOAO?
QLTY yields 0.66% while TOAO yields 0.00%, so QLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TOAO better than QLTY?
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.