QLTY vs UTF
GMO US Quality ETF vs Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund Inc
Which is better, QLTY or UTF?
QLTY has been ahead.
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QLTY | UTF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 3.42% |
| AUM | $5.4B | $3.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.66% | 7.58% |
| Holdings | 90 | 311 |
| YTD Return | +14.13%Best | +10.17% |
| 1Y Return | +20.95%Best | +14.56% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.84%Best | +17.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9%Best | 15.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.0% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $17,733Best | $14,862 |
| Fund Family | GMO | Cohen & Steers Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 13, 2023 | Mar 30, 2004 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
QLTY vs UTF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
QLTY vs UTF Performance
GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund Inc (UTF) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds. Over the past year QLTY returned +20.95% while UTF returned +14.56%. Year to date, QLTY is up 14.13% versus a gain of 10.17% for UTF.
Over three years, QLTY compounded at +21.84% per year against +17.54% for UTF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UTF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 11.9% for QLTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.0% for QLTY and -15.8% for UTF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QLTY charges 0.50% per year while UTF charges 3.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $342 annually, a gap of $292 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QLTY currently yields 0.66% against 7.58% for UTF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 45 holdings in QLTY and 252 in UTF, totalling 99.7% and 93.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 99 days apart, QLTY as of Oct 7, 2026 and UTF as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in QLTY and 252 in UTF, against full books of 90 and 311.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QLTY and UTF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QLTY or UTF?
QLTY has an expense ratio of 0.50% while UTF charges 3.42%. QLTY is the cheaper option, by $292 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QLTY or UTF?
Over the past year QLTY returned +20.95% vs +14.56% for UTF, so QLTY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QLTY or UTF?
UTF has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 11.9% for QLTY. Worst drawdown: QLTY -17.0% vs UTF -15.8%.
Should I hold both QLTY and UTF?
QLTY and UTF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QLTY or UTF?
QLTY yields 0.66% while UTF yields 7.58%, so UTF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UTF better than QLTY?
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.